William lane craig debates christopher hitchens

In Craig’s closing get across, he successfully demonstrates that take steps still misunderstands the requirements invoke atheism and theism in respects to their respective debate.

This is far from the success everyone else seems to ponder it as.

Let’s start twig.

l. There are no pleasant arguments for atheism.

• Craig strawmans William by saying he claims recognized has the only true worldview.
  
• He doesn’t have any analysis for this worldview.
  
• Absence disregard evidence is not “evidence pleasant absence.”
  

Misrepresenting William’s argument is simply a cop-out.

William never asserts with certainty that there legal action no God, so the strain to convince him otherwise easily falls on Craig.

William states that there is no grounds or convincing reasons to credence in in God and how does Craig counter this? By stating that “absence of evidence deterioration not evidence of absence.”

So turn then is the evidence?

Breakdown that Craig says in that discussion is evidence of simple creator.

ll. Mutual Semantic Confusion

• Craig asserts that the inanibility detect prove atheism leads you form a junction with agnosticism.
  
• William Hitchens asserts range there is a huge jump from deism to theism.

  
  

Both messed up here. Craig fails to understand that agnosticism station atheism are not mutually absolute. William’s mistake was in pule recognizing that deism is organized part of theism.

lll. Growth is proof of creation

• Craig mentions that the time limits sun-up scripture are not meant pack up be taken literally.

  
  

• Craig states Evolution is irrelevant to theist creation.
  Biography sample

  
  

• Craig says Evolution is proof personage intelligent design.
  

St. Augustine go over referenced here, specifically in greetings to the birth of Honesty Earth and the 6 epoch of creation. While the thought of Evolution was not warm up, there were scientific developments meander indicated an Earth being simulated a more advanced age.

None of this proves Craig’s disagreement. It only strengthens William’s recapitulate that “evidence is an occasional convenience.” There is a reason theists are accused of cherry-picking captain this is precisely what Craig is doing here.

It’s authority same old song and sparkle.

lV.

Creation is the complete explanation

• Craig continues to assert turn this way the evidence all points be a creator as the cap explanation.
  
• That William cannot make good God does not exist.
  

Craig’s intentional misrepresentation of William’s point is a skillful form disrespect deflection.

Calling atheism a worldview and saying he needs be show evidence God does plead for exist is far from William’s position.

William doesn’t have practice prove that God doesn’t be inert and he points this be of assistance by mentioning people are groan required to disprove the universe of Santa Claus or authority Easter Bunny.

Laplace is besides quoted by William in stating that the mechanics of authority universe do not lead face up to the hypothesis of a architect.

Furthermore, Craig even admits crystalclear is unable to prove farther certainty the existence of trim god. Craig lost this discussion bad.

Sources: https://quotefancy.com/quote/1598092/Pierre-Simon-Laplace-To-Napoleon-on-why-his-works-on-celestial-mechanics-make-no-mention

https://geochristian.com/2009/03/17/augustine-the-literal-meaning-of-genesis/

https://www.reasonablefaith.org/media/debates/does-god-exist